Class
mailing list: engl016-302-02A@lists.upenn.edu
Taking its title from Cardinal Newman's book about what a university ought to be, this class will look at his and other ideas about the ideal -- or not so ideal -- university. Occupants of the "real" world often distinguish it from the "academic" world, making their own real life experiences a basis for discounting or active contempt of those whose lives are merely academic. In turn, academics may scorn those who grub in the world and see their own as the only environment in which disinterested thought and research can take place. Whatever their status within the academy, faculty may feel marginalized by the larger society in which they live, anxious to be heard by it yet frustrated when they are not. Students may think (or have been told) that their student years are "the best years of their lives." Yet they may also wait eagerly for graduation when they finally get out of school to encounter reality. These and related constructions (academic vs. real life; the best years of our lives; how we envisage academics in society; how we envisage the idea of the university itself) are the subject of this course.
We will read a few "theoretical" texts that consider the idea of the university from a variety of perspectives. We will also read several very different kinds of texts: novels, works perhaps unlike Newman's that, explicitly fictitious, consider the experience of the university from the points of view of students and faculty.
Note carefully: this is a class for people who like to read. The reading list is heavy, although the instructor labors under the delusion that it is also manageable. The instructor reserves the right to spring pop quizzes, unannounced, if it becomes clear that people are not keeping up, so consider carefully, realistically, and early on whether this is a reading list you really want to cope with.
The class has neither a midterm nor a final. Students will write three short papers, and one longer final one. Those papers will ask students variously to respond to the readings or to think about the nature of "the university" on the basis not only of those readings but also of their own experience of the university in their second semester at one.
Students are expected to attend all classes and to contribute to the discussion of issues raised in the readings. Active classroom participation will be a significant factor in all final grades. In addition, the course requires the papers mentioned above. Short papers should be short -- approximately 750 words (1000 words maximum). The final paper should be about 2000 words (2500 words maximum). The instructor will either provide paper topics as assignments or students with a specific topic in mind may write on it if the instructor, after consultation, has agreed.
Some additional points:
PAPER ONE IS DUE TODAY
To shift from
Newman's high idealism about the university to the depictions of
universities and their professors offered by Ferber-Levy and
Thurber-Nugent is to make a very fast descent into what seems to be farce,
stupidity, and a wide range of callow behaviors that have nothing
whatsoever to do with "the life of the mind" universities exist to
cultivate. What aspects of universities (or might it only be "American
universities"?) makes this descent so plausible for an American
theater-going audience? Or -- if you prefer: this is (perhaps) an
alternate possible topic -- do the critiques offered by these two plays
say something different about universities than that they fail to fulfill
their raison d'être?
PAPER TWO IS DUE
TODAY
We've read about the university as a site of comedic
ineffectiveness, stupidity, hypocrisy, and self-aggrandizement for the
past several weeks. What is it about colleges and universities that makes
them so attractive -- and, of course, so useful -- to the
would-be comic writer?
PAPER
THREE IS DUE TODAY
We have made a turn, this week, to writers
for whom the university -- and, more broadly, the world of ideas -- is a
profoundly serious place. Has anything you have experienced
in your first and, now, second semester suggested that this view might be
valid? -- NOTE: this topic does not ask you specifically to use
what you've been reading in writing your essay; but, to the degree that
you can relate readings and experience, the instructor will find himself
increasingly pleased with your essay.
You can
send Traister e-mail concerning this page at
traister@pobox.upenn.edu